<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the record (RE: Big Bang and, indirectly, God)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/</link>
	<description>From physics to philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 03:49:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GP</title>
		<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>Apologetics isn&#039;t bad in principle... unless they taught you complete garbage about the big bang, which I&#039;m guessing they would have, since it seems to be fundamental part of the field...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologetics isn&#8217;t bad in principle&#8230; unless they taught you complete garbage about the big bang, which I&#8217;m guessing they would have, since it seems to be fundamental part of the field&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>lol i took christian apologetics as part of my required curriculum in HS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol i took christian apologetics as part of my required curriculum in HS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>yup... and CPU speed is probably speed of light * 2 ... or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup&#8230; and CPU speed is probably speed of light * 2 &#8230; or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GP</title>
		<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Actually, there&#039;s evidence for that! The universe has a resolution just like a digital photograph or the environment in a video game. The Planck length and time are the size of the &quot;pixels&quot;, which are small enough that we don&#039;t see them in everyday life, but if you look close enough, they are there. That&#039;s what quantum mechanics is all about. Although I don&#039;t think many physicists would jump to describe it in those terms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there&#8217;s evidence for that! The universe has a resolution just like a digital photograph or the environment in a video game. The Planck length and time are the size of the &#8220;pixels&#8221;, which are small enough that we don&#8217;t see them in everyday life, but if you look close enough, they are there. That&#8217;s what quantum mechanics is all about. Although I don&#8217;t think many physicists would jump to describe it in those terms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booberfish.com/blog/2006/11/for-the-record-re-big-bang-and-indirectly-god/#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>For the record, I think we are living in a computerized simulation, a mix between MIB and Matrix (each are too extreme). :)

For the past years, I have been looking out for problem in God&#039;s rendering algorithms and there are many. If scientists would think of the universe as bits and bytes and basic algorithms, I&#039;m sure we&#039;d be surprised that it was actually a few exabits worth of 1s all in one block, then they started the timer.

Ok now I go back to sleep ;) Seriously, I agree with you the big bang theory doesn&#039;t account for anything else than the expansion of the universe and how it might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I think we are living in a computerized simulation, a mix between MIB and Matrix (each are too extreme). :)</p>
<p>For the past years, I have been looking out for problem in God&#8217;s rendering algorithms and there are many. If scientists would think of the universe as bits and bytes and basic algorithms, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;d be surprised that it was actually a few exabits worth of 1s all in one block, then they started the timer.</p>
<p>Ok now I go back to sleep ;) Seriously, I agree with you the big bang theory doesn&#8217;t account for anything else than the expansion of the universe and how it might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

